This blog posting represents the views of the author, David Fosberry. Those opinions may change over time. They do not constitute an expert legal or financial opinion.
If you have comments on this blog posting, please email me .
The Opinion Blog is organised by threads, so each post is identified by a thread number ("Major" index) and a post number ("Minor" index). If you want to view the index of blogs, click here to download it as an Excel spreadsheet.
Click here to see the whole Opinion Blog.
To view, save, share or refer to a particular blog post, use the link in that post (below/right, where it says "Show only this post").
Show only this post | |
Posted on 8th December 2024 |
Show all posts in this thread (Computer Hardware).
|
This article on Trendforce reports that Intel's new 18A chip manufacturing process achieved yields on only 10% in recent tests. A yield of 10% is far too low to put the process into production, which was planned for next year. Broadcom, who ran the tests, have now cancelled their orders with Intel, due to the low yields, and is looking for an alternative supplier. Other customers are probably doing the same. I don't find this news particularly surprising: in recent years Intel has had many problems with their chip foundry processes, and have been consistently behind their competition in introducing new generation CPUs and RAM with smaller geometries (the smaller the geometry of chips, the faster they run, the less power they use, and the more can be packed on a chip). There was a time when Intel led the world, but those times are long over. |