This blog posting represents the views of the author, David Fosberry. Those opinions may change over time. They do not constitute an expert legal or financial opinion.

If you have comments on this blog posting, please email me .

The Opinion Blog is organised by threads, so each post is identified by a thread number ("Major" index) and a post number ("Minor" index). If you want to view the index of blogs, click here to download it as an Excel spreadsheet.

Click here to see the whole Opinion Blog.

To view, save, share or refer to a particular blog post, use the link in that post (below/right, where it says "Show only this post").

The EU is Good for Britain

Posted on 22nd October 2015

Show only this post
Show all posts in this thread.

The discussion about Britain's membership of the EU is starting to heat up, with positions and facts coming from people other than politians, at last.

As described in this BBC report, the Bank of England has published the results of their analysis. Their conclusion is that there are negative and positive effects from the UK's membership of the European Union, but that on balance, membership is beneficial for Britain.

Also, recently, the CBI (the Confederation of British Industry, the main representative of employers and industry in Britain - more information here and here) have finally climbed off the fence regarding the UK's EU membership (as reported by the BBC here). They say "... there are problems with EU membership but that these are greatly outweighed by the benefits..." Most of the CBI's members want to stay within the 28-country EU.

These two pro-European positions really should not surprise anyone. The economic benefits of membership are significant, and will continue to grow. Just bear in mind what Britain's modern economy is based upon: it is no longer a major exporter of agricultural products; it ceased to be a net exported of minerals centuries ago; the contribution from manufacturing is negligible; Brits are mainly exporters of services. Services covers a multitude of different things, but service exports from Britain are dominated by financial services (banking, insurance and investment services). The single European market for goods has existed for many years, but the single European market for financial services is really only now being constructed, and once it is, Britain will really start to reap rewards. Do we really want to exit the EU just as it starts to pay-off?

Also, bear in mind that a lot of financial services business flows through Britain because it is seen around the world as a gateway to European markets: a business friendly, English speaking channel to invest in the EU. Stopping that flow of business would really be a case of cutting off our noses to spite our faces.

There is a general perception, in continental Europe and in Britain, that Britain is a reluctant member of the EU. As a Brit living in continental Europe, I agree. This reluctance is analysed in more detail in this report in The Economist. Euro-sceptics abound, and there are news stories almost every day about the interference from Brussels in how the UK is run. The Economist suggests that Britain has it pretty good in the EU: "That Britain has the least-regulated labour market and second-least-regulated product market in Europe. The most damaging measures, such as planning restrictions and the new living wage, are home-grown". This means that "Brexit" will not solve all Britain's problems.

I am sure that virtually every reader knows that politicians cannot be trusted. So why are people so surprised by the suggestion that British policians are being "economical with the truth" when it comes to where the blame lies for Britain's troubles? It was a tried and tested technique for despotic regimes around the world (The Soviet Union, Cuba, Venezuela, and Iran, to name but a few) to divert attention and blame onto external players and away from themselves; if it works for despots, why not for mainstream politicians?

Time to stop complaining about the EU gravy train that Britain is on, and get ready to make the most of the next course.

Who Put This Idiot In Power?

Posted on 2nd July 2015

Show only this post
Show all posts in this thread.

I am serious! Which of you voted for David Cameron and the Conservative Party at the last elections? The man is an idiot, a liar, and a sneaky snake.

The latest gem is described in this BBC report. In it he says that he is prepared to wait until after the British referendum on EU membership before renegotiating the EU treaty.

Leaving aside the small matter of it being a good idea to find out what the British people think before taking any action, his detailed statement is totally nonsensical. He said he wants "irreversible" and "legally binding" guarantees that EU law will be changed at some point in the future. He seems to think that we have all forgotten the main reason why the EU treaty needs renegotiation: that every member has a right to veto any decision, which mean that no-one is in any position to give "irreversible" and "legally binding" guarantees about any matter.

I am guessing that his game-plan is to be able to declare that the EU were not willing to comply with his small and perfectly reasonable request for guarantees, so that he can get unreasonable in the way he deals with them.

I am generally horrified with how the whole EU membership/treaty issue has been dealt with by the Conservative Party. At the last election, all the main parties worked hard to de-emphasise the EU issue, to ensure that it wasn't the basis of people's voting choice. Then, just after the election, the Chancellor George Osborne said the new Conservative government had a "very clear mandate" to renegotiate the UK's relationship with the European Union, as described in this BBC story. I don't think so, Mr. Osborne and Mr. Cameron; you have a clear mandate to get a mandate, and nothing more.

As a Brit living in continental Europe, mostly travelling and working in the Euro-zone, I find it hard to understand how British people do not see the benefits of full and committed EU and Euro membership. I have more than a kilogram of change from many countries, from my pre-Euro business travelling, all of which is now dead money; most of those problems are now things of the past. The free movement of labour in Europe also has direct impact on my work life; if Britain leaves the EU, or radically alters their terms of membership, I may have no choice but to change my citizenship (thank you so much!).

One of Britain's biggest industries is financial services, and that industry is competing in Europe with one hand tied behind their back, because Britain is not in the Euro.

Time to wake up and smell the roses!